Is it possible that Education is the only part of our world that is not enhanced by technology? That’s the impression I sometimes get. When I propose incorporating the advanced tools of Autodesk Inventor into the engineering curriculum the typical response is that there isn't enough time. Is that really a valid response? Why can't the technology be incorporated into the curriculum as a tool taught as part of the curriculum?
In the commercial world (which many of the students will someday join) tools like Inventor are not used for the sake of using them, they’re used to make the job of the engineer easier, make the design more comprehensible, enhance the safety and quality of products and validate a fresh idea without the need to build a physical prototype. And that’s all before lunch!
Why then is the technology not viewed as a tool to teach engineering when it is a tool to execute it outside of academia? I think the problem lies in the assumption that CAD is an accessory to engineering and not a necessity. I don’t blame anyone for allowing that perception to take hold based on the technology of ten years ago but as engineers and designers aren’t we supposed to on a noble and eternal quest for better, faster, and easier? The tools that are available for free on the Autodesk Education Community today are functionally superior to anything at any cost that was available just a few years ago so why don’t students use them to learn engineering.
What if the assignment was to take a set of data that was missing one value and enter those values into the CAD system, do the finite element analysis and see the faulty result. Then use the principles to calculate all of the necessary inputs and run the analysis again. This would teach the importance and asking the complete question and give them some experience in using technology with a critical eye. The visual feedback that is given will be easier to understand and more completely relay the information to the Generation Net student. There are hundreds of ways this could be used ranging from understanding stresses, visualizing a complex mechanism, to seeing the values of minimal bend radii for the wires in a harness.
Could it be that one of the reasons that we’re struggling to find the engineers of the future is because we insist on teaching them using the tools that their grandparents used? If we’re not going to use CAD as a teaching tool then why bother with Calculators when an Abacus worked for centuries or even those troublesome ink pens, did da Vinci ever “flick a Bic”?
The tools are readily available; the technology has advanced beyond the wildest dreams of most and now is the time to make them an integral part of teaching engineering not an afterthought or an accessory. This is not an option and everyone from the Teaching Assistants to the Dean must become more aware of what is possible using todays technology. I promise you will be amazed and inspired.
Aspire to Inspire - always